Before Proof
Before Proof/Contents/Logic & Proof

Logic & Proof

What makes an argument binding?

Before anything can be proved, something has to settle what counts as a proof. This subject builds that machinery from ordinary language: what a statement is, what a quantifier really claims, and why four or five argument shapes turn out to be enough for all of mathematics.

4 films4 documents3 problem sets54% complete
No prerequisites. This is the floor.
1

Statements

When is a sentence the kind of thing that can be true?

2 units · 2 films
2 documents
Film13:20
Opens the questionWatched 19k times
Unit 1

What a proof is for

Two people can agree on every fact and still disagree, which is a clue that argument is doing something beyond stating facts. The film finds the gap; the document formalises it.

Film11:05
Opens the questionWatched 11k times
Unit 2

Truth tables were not obvious

Implication as usually defined says that a false statement implies anything, which offends everybody the first time they meet it. The film shows why every alternative is worse.

2

Quantifiers

How much does swapping two words change?

2 units · 2 films
2 documents
Film15:48
Opens the questionWatched 14k times
Unit 3

For all, there exists, and the order of the words

Swapping two quantifiers turns a true statement into a false one, and the film builds a case where the difference is the difference between a theorem and nonsense.

Film9:52
Opens the questionWatched 7.2k times
Unit 4

Negation, done mechanically

Negating a statement with three nested quantifiers is a procedure, not an insight — but only once you have watched the procedure fail when applied carelessly.

3

Methods of proof

Why does assuming the opposite ever work?

2 units · 2 films
1 document · 1 in draft
Film16:30
Opens the questionWatched 26k times
Unit 5

Contradiction, and why it feels like cheating

Proving something by assuming its opposite looks like sleight of hand until you see it as the only tool available for a negative claim. Irrationality is the case study.

Film14:12
Opens the questionNot yet released
Unit 6 Document in draft

Induction is not about dominoes

The domino picture explains the mechanism and hides the axiom. What induction actually rests on is a property of the natural numbers that has to be assumed.

4

Formal systems

What if the rules themselves are the object of study?

In preparation — leads into Incompleteness

Logic & Proof, as one volume

Every document in this subject is a chapter of the same book, compiled from one source with live cross-references and continuous numbering. Download the whole thing, or take chapters as you go — the page numbers and theorem references agree either way.

Download Volume I  ↓

142 pages · PDF · 5.2 MB · revision 8, 2 September 2026 · LaTeX source available